Previously submitted to: JMIR Mental Health (no longer under consideration since Oct 23, 2024)
Date Submitted: Mar 13, 2023
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures and Concepts Included in Trials on Problematic Internet Use
ABSTRACT
Background:
This scoping review was conducted as the first phase of the development of the Problematic Internet Use (PIU) Core Result Set (COS-EPOCH). The purpose of this review is to identify the results collected and reported in randomized controlled trials of PIU. A systematic scoping review was conducted based on published guidelines. Trial registries and Medline were searched, and the retrieved records were screened by two reviewers. Results are assigned to result domains and similar definitions within each domain are merged based on key literature and expert consensus. Estimate the result and domain frequencies and represent them in the result matrix. Seven outcome domains were identified from 78 included studies: observation of Internet addiction, mental/emotional measurement, laboratory examination, TCM indicators, general self-test, follow-up, adverse reactions and other special measures. The most commonly reported result area is Internet addiction Diagnosis Scale (IAT), mental health symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and Self-rating depression scale (SDS). 201 unique outcomes were identified, indicating a high degree of heterogeneity. The significant heterogeneity of the results supports the need to develop COS-EPOCH.
Objective:
The outcome index set of PIU is developed by using relevant methods.
Methods:
The purpose of this review is to identify the results collected and reported in randomized controlled trials of PIU. A systematic scoping review was conducted based on published guidelines. Trial registries and Medline were searched, and the retrieved records were screened by two reviewers. Results are assigned to result domains and similar definitions within each domain are merged based on key literature and expert consensus. Estimate the result and domain frequencies and represent them in the result matrix.
Results:
Seven outcome domains were identified from 78 included studies: observation of Internet addiction, mental/emotional measurement, laboratory examination, TCM indicators, general self-test, follow-up, adverse reactions and other special measures. The most commonly reported result area is Internet addiction Diagnosis Scale (IAT), mental health symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) and Self-rating depression scale (SDS). 201 unique outcomes were identified, indicating a high degree of heterogeneity. The significant heterogeneity of the results supports the need to develop COS-EPOCH.
Conclusions:
This review identifies significant heterogeneity in outcomes measured and reported in PIU intervention trials. Seven result domains were identified and a large number of results are currently reported in relatively few studies. As Internet use becomes an integral part of humanity, more and more people are suffering from PIUs, and effective and efficient interventions are needed. The results of this scoped review will support the development of COS EPOCH, with the aim of guiding PIU intervention studies and facilitating the synthesis of knowledge between studies to ensure that investigators obtain a more comprehensive domain of indicators in trials involving patients with PIU.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.