Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Formative Research (no longer under consideration since Aug 28, 2024)

Date Submitted: Mar 15, 2023

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Effectiveness of Internet-Based physical examination model for focus populations in the community: A community demonstration trial

  • Zhijie Huang; 
  • Zhihua Mai; 
  • Yuming He; 
  • Ying Su; 
  • Baoxin Chen; 
  • Chanjiao Zheng; 
  • Sifan Huang; 
  • Zhiheng Zhou

ABSTRACT

Background:

There is strong evidence that the use of Internet-based interventions can promote the efficiency of physical examination. So far, few studies have investigated the effectiveness of Internet-Based physical examination model for focus populations in the community.

Objective:

The study aimed at assessing the feasibility and effectiveness of an Internet-Based physical examination model for focus populations in the community.

Methods:

This was a health economic evaluation alongside a community demonstration trial,with 12 months follow-up. Participants were over 65 years old and those with chronic diseases 35 years old and above. The Internet-Based model was tested in the Dashi Street Community, Panyu District, Guangzhou, China in 2021. A total of 5,864 persons were included in the traditional model, and 8,097 in the Internet-Based model. We introduced a cost-benefit analysis(cost-benefit ratio,net benefit) to examine the effects on patients and healthcare staff compared between the 2 models.

Results:

The Internet-Based model, comparing to the Traditional model, was associated with higher clinic rate (37.83% vs. 25.12%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.81), higher rates of newly established health records for the elderly (17% vs. 8%, OR = 2.25), higher rates of newly established records for persons with hypertension (7% vs. 2%, OR = 4.00), and higher rates of newly established records for persons with diabetes (3% vs.1%, OR = 3.54) (all, P < 0.05). The annual total labor cost decreased by 22.09%, but the annual medical costs of resident physical examinations increased by 57%. The total benefit of new health documentation was increased by 114%. The satisfaction with physical examinations and the willingness to seek medical treatment at community health service centers were both increased compared to the traditional model (both, P < 0.05). The time waiting for physical examinations of patients of different ages was shorter (P<0.001), and the benefit-to-cost ratio and net benefit were higher (2.45 vs. 1.26;833,100 vs. 190,700).

Conclusions:

Internet-Based physical examination model for focus populations in the community were better than those of the traditional model. It’s worthy of further application and promotion to improve the health management effect of community focus populations.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Huang Z, Mai Z, He Y, Su Y, Chen B, Zheng C, Huang S, Zhou Z

Effectiveness of Internet-Based physical examination model for focus populations in the community: A community demonstration trial

JMIR Preprints. 15/03/2023:47201

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.47201

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/47201

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.