Previously submitted to: JMIR Infodemiology (no longer under consideration since Sep 18, 2023)
Date Submitted: Nov 21, 2022
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Toxic Positivity in Young Adult Cancer Caregivers’ Social Media Posts: A Content Analysis
ABSTRACT
Background:
Compared with older cancer caregivers, young adult cancer caregivers (YACC) experience greater stress and depression during the first six months of caregiving. However, social support can buffer the negative psychological effects associated with cancer caregiving. Social media (SM) is one avenue through which YACC often seek social support. However, toxic positivity— the excessive and ineffective overgeneralization of a positive state even in the worst circumstances—is a potential danger of SM and may contribute to further distress.
Objective:
The purpose of this study was to examine the social media posts of YACC to describe how toxic positivity manifests in YACC discourse on social media.
Methods:
In this secondary analysis, the cancer-related SM posts (N = 760) of 34 YACC were extracted for six months from the day of cancer diagnosis and imported into NVivo qualitative analysis software. Open coding of posts from N = 4 YACC identified a pattern in which posts may have been insensitive or dismissive of others’ emotions. Similar posts were grouped together, forming categories of toxic positivity which were used to create a codebook and code all remaining posts.
Results:
Content analysis identified three main categories of toxic positivity in YACC’s SM posts: supplications (n = 251, 33%), prevailing (n = 7, 10.1%), and platitudes (n = 16, 2.1%). Supplications involved prayer or trust in god, prevailing posts compared dealing with cancer to a fight and suggested that the person with cancer would prevail, and platitudes used outdated, overused, and or disingenuous phrases meant to comfort.
Conclusions:
Findings suggest that when YACC use SM during cancer experiences they may encounter a culture of toxic positivity. Among acquaintances, SM may be best suited for instrumental support (e.g. transportation to appointments, meal preparation) rather than emotional support.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.