Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR AI (no longer under consideration since Feb 24, 2025)

Date Submitted: Oct 24, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 24, 2022 - Dec 19, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

“Constructing Machine Learning models for Orthodontic Treatment Planning: a comparison of different methods.”

  • Hamid Shojaei; 
  • Vincent Augusto

ABSTRACT

Background:

-

Objective:

In this study, we investigated the feasibility of leveraging different machine learning methods to help with clinical decision-making on orthodontic treatment planning, including the decision on extraction, extraction pattern and anchorage pattern.

Methods:

Setting and Sample Population: a group of 216 patients (156 extractions and 60 non-extraction) was enrolled. 32 input features were identified and used as the input variable. We proposed seven machine learning methods, including Logistic Regression, SVM, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gaussian NB, KNN Classifier and Neural Network for extraction and two methods including Random Forest and Neural Network for extraction and anchorage pattern.

Results:

For extraction decision, neural network yielded the most promising results with 93 % accuracy, followed by Logistic regression (86 % accuracy and 93% precision), SVM and Random Forest (83 % accuracy and 90% precision). Naïve Bayesian classifier and KNN classifier failed to produce accuracy within the acceptable range, but Naïve Bayes demonstrated the highest recall score with 92 %. For the decision on extraction & anchorage pattern neural network proved to be more reliable, with 89 % accuracy on the extraction pattern and 81% accuracy on the extraction& anchorage pattern. Random Forest classifier with 41% accuracy did not show satisfactory results for this task. The most important features for a decision on extraction in this study were Inter incisal angle, crowding in the mandible, U1-FH, L1-NB and crowding in the maxilla.

Conclusions:

The results demonstrate that neural network can yield considerable accuracy in a medical diagnosis model. However, other algorithms, such as logistic regression and random forest, can also be considered for simpler tasks such as extraction.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Shojaei H, Augusto V

“Constructing Machine Learning models for Orthodontic Treatment Planning: a comparison of different methods.”

JMIR Preprints. 24/10/2022:43784

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.43784

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/43784

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.