Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics (no longer under consideration since Oct 02, 2022)
Date Submitted: Aug 31, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 31, 2022 - Oct 2, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
On the Implementation of Artificial Intelligence Models in Clinical Workflows: Too Often the Missing Discipline at the Table
ABSTRACT
While AI is making inroads into the clinical practice of medicine, its progress is impeded by a lack of interaction between diagnostic and prognostic predictive model developers and healthcare administrators, providers and staff. While developers judge the success of such models through performance measures of discrimination and calibration, healthcare workers are concerned with clinical significance. While the research literature abounds with papers describing all manners of model development, a paucity of guidance is available on how to implement such models after prioritizing those with the greatest chance of optimizing local clinical processes and outcomes. This manuscript describes a four-factor framework to estimate the potential for the successful implementation of a predictive model in a health system to aid health system leaders, providers in planning such interventions in the clinical workflow. This framework addresses the lack of interaction between model developers and users by planning for meaningful interactions through the implementation and evaluation process. As such, it addresses a critical problem at the planning table, setting the stage for future collaboration between the parties.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.