Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Apr 07, 2023)

Date Submitted: Jun 23, 2022

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Use of electronic patient records and encrypted email patient communication among Swiss chiropractors: a population-based cross-sectional study

  • Cesar A. Hincapié; 
  • Léonie Hofstetter; 
  • Rahim Lalji; 
  • Longin Korner; 
  • Mireille C Schläppi; 
  • Serafin Leemann

ABSTRACT

Background:

The implementation of electronic health information technologies is a key target for health care quality improvement. Among Swiss chiropractors, reliable data on the use of electronic heath information technologies and distribution of the health workforce was lacking.

Objective:

To estimate the prevalence of electronic patient record (EPR) and encrypted email communication use among Swiss chiropractors and describe the geographic distribution of chiropractors in Switzerland.

Methods:

Population-based cross-sectional study of all active practising members of the Swiss Chiropractic Association (ChiroSuisse) between 3 December 2019 and 31 January 2020. We asked about clinician and practice characteristics, EPR use for clinical record keeping, use of encrypted email for patient communication, and information on EPR and encrypted email communication products used. Multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed the association between clinician and practice characteristics and (1) EPR use and (2) encrypted email communication use.

Results:

Among 286 eligible Swiss chiropractors (193 [68%] men; mean age, 51.4 [SD, 11.2] years), 217 (76%) completed the survey (140 [65%] men; mean age 50.7 [11.2] years). The density of chiropractors in Switzerland was 3.3 per 100,000 inhabitants. 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 54%) of respondents reported using an EPR in their practice, while 60% (95% CI, 54% to 67%) endorsed using encrypted email technology. Chiropractors aged ≥60 (versus those ≤39) years were 74% less likely to use an EPR system (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.77), while clinicians from practices with 4 or more chiropractors (versus those from solo practices) were over 5 times more likely to report EPR use (OR 5.6, 2.1 to 16.5). Findings for factors associated with encrypted email use were similar.

Conclusions:

As of January 2020, 286 duly licensed chiropractors were available to provide musculoskeletal healthcare in Switzerland and just under 50% of Swiss chiropractors used an EPR system in clinical practice. Better implementation of EPR and electronic health information technologies in Swiss chiropractic practice is possible and desirable for the purpose of musculoskeletal healthcare quality improvement. Clinical Trial: Not applicable.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Hincapié CA, Hofstetter L, Lalji R, Korner L, Schläppi MC, Leemann S

Use of electronic patient records and encrypted email patient communication among Swiss chiropractors: a population-based cross-sectional study

JMIR Preprints. 23/06/2022:40501

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.40501

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/40501

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.