Previously submitted to: JMIR Perioperative Medicine (no longer under consideration since Jul 17, 2023)
Date Submitted: Jun 8, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: May 12, 2022 - Jul 7, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Adoption of Telemedicine to Support Postoperative Visits: Mixed Methods Study of Technological Readiness and Attitudes Among Surgeons
ABSTRACT
Background:
Despite the promise shown by telemedicine technologies, the adoption among clinicians before the COVID-19 pandemic was relatively slow, particularly with untapped potential in postoperative applications. Consistent with this trend, we also noticed underutilization of telemedicine in our organization’s surgery department for postoperative follow-up visits.
Objective:
To explore the barriers of telemedicine adoption for use in postoperative follow-up visits in an environment where such technology has been available.
Methods:
Surgeons were recruited from a large tertiary care hospital in the Southwestern United States. We assessed readiness and attitudes towards new technology quantitatively (Technology Readiness Index, Technology Acceptance Model, and modified Van der Laan’s Technology Acceptance Questionnaire); conducted a usability study with mock patient encounters (System Usability Scale); and engaged the participants in semi-structured interviews (employing qualitative thematic analysis). Construct validity of quantitative measures and rater convergence on qualitative analysis were satisfactory.
Results:
Nine non-adopting surgeons (4 general, 3 surgical oncology, 1 wound specialist, and 1 thoracic) were recruited. Our quantitative analysis suggested a strong positive influence of surgeons’ perceived ease of use and optimism traits on the perceived usefulness of the technology, which suggests that surgeons’ perception of practical worth and applicability influence their perception of telemedicine’s usefulness. Contrary to our expectations, a significant negative relationship between visual appeal and perceived ease of use resulted from the analysis. It could be inferred that health care professionals may give more value to the efficiency and overall usability of the technology compared to its visual aesthetics. Qualitative analysis of short interviews revealed surgeons generally perceive the telemedicine platform to be beneficial for postoperative visits, with an emphasis on patient-centered benefits such as time- and cost-related savings. However, several important barriers to adoption exist including the lack of time for proper training, lack of patients’ interest, concerns regarding potential disruption to clinical workflow, concerns regarding the impact in the patient-physician relationship, and the requirement for additional features in the existing platform. Additionally, concerns were raised regarding the appropriateness for telemedicine to be used for certain medical conditions (i.e., oncology-related care).
Conclusions:
While attitudes towards technology adoption were positive, many clinicians expressed desire to continue the traditional modality of in-clinic visits and indicated that their patients shared the same desire. In addition, concerns were raised regarding the nature of medical cases for which telemedicine would be utilized. Our findings suggested that improved awareness of telemedicine systems and their capabilities in large healthcare system in addition to increased optimism may play a major role in their eventual adoption.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.