Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since May 16, 2022)
Date Submitted: Mar 14, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Feb 22, 2022 - Apr 19, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Remote Hearing Aid Fitting in Adults: a systematic review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Deafness is a disability affecting 430 million people worldwide. Hearing aids are one of the most common ways to deal with this disability. Once delivered, hearing aids must be adjusted by an audiologist. Until now, this adjustment was done face-to-face, which can be a problem in area with limited access to healthcare, audiology centers, for people with mobility problems or, more recently, during coronavirus pandemic. In the era of pandemic teleaudiology gained in popularity.
Objective:
The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of remote hearing aids fitting procedures in adults.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted in agreement with the PRISMA 2020 statement, across 4 databases (Cochrane, PubMed, Science Direct and Web of Science), with the following search string: (hearing aid) AND (eHealth OR remote OR teleaudiology OR telehealth OR telemedicine) AND (fitting OR programming) NOT (children OR babies OR infants OR implant).
Results:
After completing all stages of a systematic review, our search retrieved 8 articles for full analysis: 4 interventional controlled studies, 2 case studies and 2 systematic reviews. Several issues, such as time of consultation, patient satisfaction, quality of care or hearing results were investigated and showed no significant differences between face-to-face and remote hearing aids fitting
Conclusions:
This systematic review showed strong evidences to support the use of remote hearing aids fitting, as a standard of care particularly for remote and underserved locations, patients with reduced mobility or in situations of pandemic lockdown.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.