Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Mar 11, 2022)
Date Submitted: Jan 23, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 23, 2022 - Mar 20, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
A 6P framework for engaging consumers in focus group discussions to identify needs, experiences, and expectations with digital health solutions
ABSTRACT
Background:
Focus group discussions (FGDs) have been used as an effective method to capture consumers’ needs, experiences and expectations for the design of future digital health solutions. However, engaging consumers in FGDs is challenging. To date, there is little guidance for the best practice of moderating FGDs.
Objective:
This study describes the development of a 6P framework for effectively engaging consumers in FGDs to identify their needs, experiences and expectations for future digital health solutions.
Methods:
A 6P framework – prototype, people, protocol, place, parity and parallelism – for consumer engagement in FGDs was developed by a multidisciplinary team via synthesizing the evidence in the literature. The 6P framework was implemented in two FGDs at a hospital in South-West New South Wales, Australia. Patients with obesity (35kg/m2) who were undergoing weight-loss treatment at the hospital were recruited using purposive sampling. Discussions collected user needs, experiences, and expectations with a prototype mobile health app to support self-management of obesity. The FGD recordings were transcribed verbatim and content analysis was conducted.
Results:
Twelve adult participants (5 men, 7 women) participated in two FGDs. The well-prepared prototype (a mHealth app), people (developing team, moderator, observers, and technical assistants), protocol (interview guide, plan and handout), and place (physical and virtual friendly one) enabled the participants to actively engage in FGDs to express their needs, experiences and expectations. Participants expressed positive thoughts about the overall usability and usefulness of the app. They provided suggestions for further improvement of the app in terms of information quality (the presence of some irrelevant, incomprehensible, or incomplete information) and system quality (difficulty of using app functions). Participants also expressed an expectation to see more personalized graphical designs that are easy to comprehend. The moderator used the two techniques – parity and parallelism, to control the dominant participants and encourage silent participants, so that they can express their opinions as objectively as possible.
Conclusions:
Following the 6P framework to moderate FGDs is conducive for consumers to understand the discussion topic, engage in peer interaction about a prototype and relate the interactional experience with their previous digital solution usage experiences. The framework provides insight for managing dominant participants and eliciting further functions. It also enables consumers to effectively reflect, understand and express their needs, experiences and expectations in digital solution co-design in FGDs.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.