Previously submitted to: JMIR Infodemiology (no longer under consideration since Aug 03, 2022)
Date Submitted: Jan 3, 2022
Open Peer Review Period: Jan 3, 2022 - Feb 28, 2022
(closed for review but you can still tweet)
NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint
Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).
Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.
Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).
Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.
Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.
Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Harnessing novel data sources to understand patients’ perspectives
ABSTRACT
Patient perspectives are central to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s benefit-risk decision-making process in the evaluation of medical products. Traditional channels of communication may not be comfortable for all patients and consumers. Social media websites have increasingly been recognized by researchers as a means to gain insights on patients’ views about treatment and diagnostic options, the healthcare system, and their experiences living with their conditions. Utilizing multiple patient perspective data sources offers the FDA the opportunity to capture diverse patient voices and experiences with chronic pain. The FDA Office of Minority Health and Health Equity (OMHHE) and the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) worked with INSPIRE (Clinica Health, Inc.) to conduct a pilot study exploring posts from INSPIRE’s own patient platform and several social media platforms to gain insights into the key challenges and barriers faced by chronic pain patients (CPPs). The most common topics discussed among CPPs were disease burden, support and advocacy needs, and proper diagnosis. The two most frequently discussed treatments were opioids or narcotics, and devices such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) machines and spinal cord stimulators. Success in pain reduction was tempered by concerns of stigmatization regarding opioid addiction and dependency. The study illustrates how social listening data may provide valuable insights into diverse patient perspectives, preferences, and unmet needs, especially for conditions that may be perceived as stigmatizing.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.