Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Oct 08, 2021)

Date Submitted: Sep 8, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Sep 6, 2021 - Oct 8, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Development and validation of a deep learning system for comprehensive imaging quality check to classify body parts and contrast enhancement

  • Seongwon Na; 
  • Yusub Sung; 
  • Yousun Ko; 
  • Youngbin Shin; 
  • Junghyun Lee; 
  • Jiyeon Ha; 
  • Sujung Ham; 
  • Kyoungro Yoon; 
  • Kyung Won Kim

ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite the dramatic increase in the use of medical imaging in various therapeutic fields of clinical trials, image quality check is still performed manually by image analysts, which requires a lot of manpower and time.

Objective:

This study aimed to develop a deep learning model that simultaneously identifies anatomical locations and contrast enhancement on medical images, with accuracy and clinical effectiveness validation, to support an automated image quality check.

Methods:

In this retrospective study, 1,669 computed tomography (CT) images with five specific anatomical locations were collected from Asan Medical Center and Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital. To generate the ground truth, two radiologists reviewed the anatomical locations and presence of contrast enhancement using the collected data. A deep learning framework called ImageQC-net (Image Quality Check-network) with transfer learning was developed using an InceptioResNetV2 model. To evaluate their clinical effectiveness, the overall accuracy and time spent on image quality check of a conventional model and ImageQC-net were compared.

Results:

The ImageQC-net body part classification showed an excellent performance in both internal (precision, 100%; recall, 100%; and accuracy, 100%) and external validation sets (precision, 99.34%; recall, 99.33%; and accuracy, 99.33%). In addition, the contrast-enhanced classification performance achieved 100% precision, recall, and accuracy in the internal validation set and ~100% accuracy in the external dataset (precision, 99.76%; recall, 99.79%; and accuracy, 99.78%). When integrating the model that achieved the best performance, the overall accuracy was 99.1%. For clinical effectiveness, the time reduction by artificial intelligence (AI)-aided quality check of both analyst 1 and 2 (49.7% and 48.3% decrease, respectively) was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

Comprehensive AI techniques to identify body parts and contrast enhancement on CT images are highly accurate and can significantly reduce the time spent on image quality checks.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Na S, Sung Y, Ko Y, Shin Y, Lee J, Ha J, Ham S, Yoon K, Kim KW

Development and validation of a deep learning system for comprehensive imaging quality check to classify body parts and contrast enhancement

JMIR Preprints. 08/09/2021:33405

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.33405

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/33405

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.