Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics (no longer under consideration since Sep 28, 2021)
Date Submitted: Aug 31, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Social Media analytics for Pharmacovigilance of Anti-Epileptic Drugs
ABSTRACT
Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder worldwide and Anti-Epileptic Drugs (AEDs) therapy is the cornerstone of its treatment. It has a laudable aim of achieving seizure freedom and minimal, if any, Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs). Too often, AEDs treatment is a long-lasting journey, in which ADRs have a crucial role in its administration. Therefore, from pharmacovigilance perspective, the detection of the ADRs of AEDs is a task of utmost importance. Typically, it is accomplished by applying data mining algorithms to a relevant data from spontaneous reporting systems. Despite their wide adoption for pharmacovigilance, the passiveness and high under-reporting ratio associated with them have encouraged considering other data source such as electronic health databases and pharmaceutical databases. Social media is the most recent alternative data source with many promising potentials to overcome the shortcomings of the traditional ones. Although, in the literature, some attempts have investigated the validity and utility of social media for ADRs detection of different groups of drugs, none of them was dedicated to the ADRs of AEDs. Hence, this paper presents a novel investigation of the validity and utility of social media as an alternative data source for the ADRs detection of AEDs. To this end, a dataset of consumers' reviews from two online health communities have been collected. The dataset is preprocessed, the unigram, bigram, and trigram are generated, and the ADRs of each AED are extracted with the aid of consumer health vocabulary and ADRs lexicon. Three widely used measures, namely proportional reporting ratio, reporting odd ratio, and information component are used to measure the association between each ADR and AED. The results, lists of signaled ADRs for each AED, are validated against Side Effect Resource (SIDER), a widely used ADRs database, in terms of precision of the ADRs detection. The validation results, 73%-74%, indicate the validity of the online health communities for the detection of AEDs ADRs. Furthermore, the lists of signaled AEDs ADRs are analyzed to answer questions regarding the common ADRs for all AEDs and the mutual similarities between AEDs in terms of their signaled ADRs. The consistency of the drawn answers with the existing pharmaceutical knowledge suggests the utility of the online health communities' data for knowledge discovery tasks of AEDs.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.