Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics (no longer under consideration since Jan 08, 2022)

Date Submitted: May 11, 2021

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

openEHR Archetypes Reuse Analysis of Clinical Knowledge Manager Instances: Case Study

  • Lingtong Min; 
  • Xiangang Liu; 
  • Deyun Zhou; 
  • Yuanjie Zhi; 
  • Xiaoyang Li; 
  • Qinyi Lv

ABSTRACT

Background:

Electronic health record information systems' continuous application has accumulated enormous medical data with potential value. Semantic interoperability is the premise of mining and realizing these values by sharing and reusing vast scattered, heterogeneous, and multi-source clinical data. Several initiatives have been developing information models to realize and improve semantic interoperability, among which the openEHR model is one of the outstanding information models. Reusing archetypes from Clinical Knowledge Manager (CKM) instances is the backbone of achieving semantic interoperability based on the openEHR approach. Archetype reuse among different CKMs is of great significance to achieve a broader range of semantic interoperability. However, the reuse of archetypes among different existing CKMs is still unclear.

Objective:

This study aims to investigate the reuse of openEHR archetypes across the CKMs approved by openEHR International for achieving and improving semantic interoperability.

Methods:

This study analyzes and compares archetype reuse across the given five CKMs (Fi-CKMs) and across the four CKMs (Fo-CKMs), respectively. Firstly, the analysis and comparison of reused archetypes are executed in terms of: archetype reuse number and archetype reuse ratio. Then, data elements of the given 25 reused archetypes were analyzed and compared across the Fi-CKMs and across the Fo-CKMs, including the type, number and ratio of the reused data elements.

Results:

The archetype reuse numbers across the Fi-CKMs and the Fo-CKMs are 25 and 58, respectively. Comparison of archetype reuse ratio showed that reducing one CKM increased the archetype reuse ratio from 5.56% - 19.23% to 12.89% - 44.62%. The analysis and comparison of data elements across the Fi-CKMs and the Fo-CKMs show that reducing one CKM increased the reusable data elements from 231 to 355, increased the data element reuse ratio from 54.20% - 70.64% to 90.33% - 100%, and increased the data element direct ratio from 89% to 100%.

Conclusions:

A large number of archetypes have been accumulated in the existing CKM instances, which provides an important foundation for the reuse of archetypes needed for semantic interoperability. With the decrease of the involving person, archetype reuse is improved, including the number of the reused archetype, the number of data element reuse, and the ratio of data element direct reused. A more effective coordination mechanism between multiple CKMs needs to be established to promote archetypes reuse across CKMs.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Min L, Liu X, Zhou D, Zhi Y, Li X, Lv Q

openEHR Archetypes Reuse Analysis of Clinical Knowledge Manager Instances: Case Study

JMIR Preprints. 11/05/2021:30338

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.30338

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/30338

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.