Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Medical Informatics (no longer under consideration since Jun 05, 2021)

Date Submitted: Apr 24, 2021
Open Peer Review Period: Apr 23, 2021 - Jun 18, 2021
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

The scientific progress and prospects of artificial intelligence in digestive endoscopy: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis

  • Peiling Gan; 
  • Shu Huang; 
  • Xiao Pan; 
  • Shali Tan; 
  • Chunyu Zhong; 
  • Huifang Xia; 
  • Muhan Lü; 
  • Xian Zhou; 
  • Xiaowei Tang

ABSTRACT

Abstract

Background:

A growing number of studies have reported artificial intelligence (AI) has been developed for diagnosis and outcome prediction in clinical practice. Furthermore, AI in digestive endoscopy has attracted much attention, which has shown promising and stimulating results. Our study aimed to visualize the articles to determine the trends and hotspots of AI in digestive endoscopy.

Methods:

Publications on AI in digestive endoscopy research were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) on March 14, 2021. Microsoft Excel 2016, VOSviewer 1.6.11.0, and CiteSpace V were used to assess and plot the research output.

Results:

The analytic research was based on original articles and reviews. A total of 121 records of AI research in digestive endoscopy published from 2017 to 2021 were retrieved. The citation number for these articles ranged from 0 to 142. The number of published articles increased 68-fold just from 2017 to 2020. All publications were distributed among 31 countries and 296 institutions. Asian countries had the most publications in this field (80.17%). Among the 31 countries, China and Japan were consistently the leading driving force and contributed mostly (31.40% and 28.93%, respectively), with a strong academic reputation in this area. Tada Tomohiro distributed the most related articles (13.22%) and was cited the most frequently. Gastrointestinal endoscopy published the largest number of publications (14.88%), and 4 of the top 10 cited references were in this leading journal. “Barrett’s esophagus” was the leading research hotspot. The keywords “classification,” “polyps,” “risk,” “histology,” and “resection” appeared most recently as research frontiers.

Conclusions:

Our study provides a systematic elaboration for researchers to obtain a good comprehension of AI development in digestive endoscopy.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Gan P, Huang S, Pan X, Tan S, Zhong C, Xia H, Lü M, Zhou X, Tang X

The scientific progress and prospects of artificial intelligence in digestive endoscopy: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis

JMIR Preprints. 24/04/2021:29882

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.29882

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/29882

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.