Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Human Factors (no longer under consideration since May 14, 2021)

Date Submitted: Apr 19, 2021

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Evaluating the effectiveness of patient education and the feasibility of health technology (eHealth interventions) in improving sleep quality and blood pressure secondary to greater adherence to continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in persons with obstructive sleep apnoea: A literature review

  • Rabie El Arab

ABSTRACT

Obstructive sleep apnoea is a highly burdensome condition that predominantly affects adults and not only impairs daily functioning but also confers a heightened risk of adverse cardiovascular health, particularly among those who are poorly compliant with continuous positive airway pressure ventilation therapy. In the growing era of high population demand and rising complexity, greater efforts are needed at the individual level if outcomes are to improve in the future. Therefore, this literature review sought to explore the effect of patient education upon sleep quality and blood pressure as secondary effects of CPAP adherence in adults. A search for relevant literature was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane library. Articles were restricted to peer-review, English language and publication in the last 10 years. Articles were appraised using CASP, relevant data was extracted using systematic proformas and the outcomes were analysed using descriptive analysis and narrative synthesis. Nine studies were included in the first analysis where there was a highly significant association between education provision and CPAP adherence (MD=1.19 hours/night, Z=3.67, p=0.0002), than compared to usual care. The second analysis was informed from five studies and this showed a positive association between education and sleep quality, but the effect was marginally insignificant (MD=0.54, Z=1.89, p=0.06), than compared to usual care. Both analyses were not affected by inter-study heterogeneity (both p<0.01). Overall, this review showed that the provision of education with moderate to high intensity provides meaningful effects upon CPAP adherence and sleep quality. Narrative findings also revealed improvements in blood pressure and other health outcomes, which are supported by previous studies. Despite some limitations, care providers should be proactivity in education provision using a continuous approach through the disease course as this is likely to lead to improvements in outcomes. Finally, future research is needed in the form of a high-quality randomised trial to help explore the effects of education delivered through eHealth mediums.


 Citation

Please cite as:

El Arab R

Evaluating the effectiveness of patient education and the feasibility of health technology (eHealth interventions) in improving sleep quality and blood pressure secondary to greater adherence to continuous positive airway pressure ventilation in persons with obstructive sleep apnoea: A literature review

JMIR Preprints. 19/04/2021:29762

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.29762

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/29762

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.