Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Dec 28, 2021)
Date Submitted: Mar 24, 2021
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Mobility, well-being, and community participation among people with depression: an observation study using geographically-explicit ecological momentary assessment (GEMA)
ABSTRACT
Background:
Globally, more than 300 million people suffer from depressive disorders. Despite a wide range of conducted research, information on the mobility and daily routines of persons with depression remains lacking.
Objective:
To describe a preliminary explication of the association between mobility, well-being, and community participation of people with depression as they occur in real-time settings.
Methods:
We used a multivariate, time-series, single-subject, repeated measures (MRSRM) design. People with depression (N=33) were invited to use a GPS device for over two weeks for continuous mobility tracking, while information on their well-being was collected with paper surveys before and after two-weeks periods. The tracking records from 32 participants were imported into Geographical Information Systems (GIS) to extract the specific mobility information. Socio-demographic and environmental information (building density, greenness index and PM2.5) was derived for statistical analysis to explore the relationship between mobility, community participation and mental health using correlation coefficients and logistic regression analysis.
Results:
The more hours participants stayed at home, the more often they had depressive symptoms (r=0.47, P<.01) but their satisfaction with life was higher (r=0.38, P<.05). On the contrary, participants with longer total distance reported more stress (r=0.47, P<.01) and the more destinations participants travelled to, the more depressive symptoms they had (r=-0.36, P<.05). Wide travelling area was positively associated with stress and negatively associated with satisfaction with life, while more time spent at home was positively associated with depressive symptoms and low self-esteem. Time spent outside the home was also negatively associated with satisfaction with life and self-esteem. The great majority (91%) perceived the tracking device as comfortable and convenient and 31% had positive feelings about mobility tracking. Still, three participants (9%) expressed that the device caused inconvenience, stress or fair as the battery needed to be charged frequently.
Conclusions:
Our study showed that having signs of depression is associated with mobility area and time spent at home among persons with depression, which may mean that their activity level in society is limited. Staying home may be a solution for avoiding extra stress, problems with self-esteem and maintaining satisfaction with life. Low-threshold access to health services should be tailored for each person based on their needs. More information based on studies using robust design, bigger sample size, and more accurate measurement methods, however, is required before individualized services can be fully achieved. Although using GPS may be a feasible data collection method, more effort should be put into collecting the data with easy-to-use technology to avoid extra stress in the participants.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.