Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (no longer under consideration since Jul 19, 2020)

Date Submitted: May 26, 2020

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Users are passive in accessing digested scientific evidence using social media: impressions from a cross-sectional study and an insight about how to overcome this barrier

  • Gabriela Manco Machado; 
  • Mariana Minatel Braga

ABSTRACT

Background:

The use of and interest in social media by health professionals as a tool for being updated as well as interacting with new scientific evidence are a reality.

Objective:

This manuscript aims to describe the first impressions from the development and the implementation of a social media web page to share digested scientific evidence (evidence translated by professionals/scientists into a more straightforward way to clinicians). Besides, we aimed to expose strengths and weakness we observed for this approach. Finally, we present a manner to overcome possible barriers found when implementing the dissemination of evidence-based information to potential users (clinicians).

Methods:

An institutional Facebook web page was launched by some researchers from the Dental School of the University of São Paulo, aiming to share reliable scientific evidence and offer scientifically digested evidence to permit clinicians to get the reliable information in Pediatric Dentistry. Another purpose was to empower them to understand further how and why such evidence could be relevant to guide their clinical practice. We collected the web page metrics of usability: posts reach (potential views) and users’ involvement (approvals, clicks on posts, comments, and shares). The relationship between the magnitude of the post reach and users’ involvement was tested using Bootstrapping Quantile Regression analysis (x1000). Weakness and strengths related to this strategy using the Facebook page were identified, and solutions proposed to minimize identified barriers.

Results:

After one year, the number of followers on Facebook page reached 1,347. The publications were potentially exposed to 4,784 users, and subsequent interaction with the page occurred only in 18% of cases. Users’ involvement with page content was associated with the number of users that visit the page (P= .005). However, users’ interaction with the page was not associated with the potential number of users that could have seen the page. (P= .25; Coef=.04; 95%;CI= -0.03 to .12). Even considering the users that effectively approved the posts, only 7%, on average, interacted with the links available into the post to going deeper to the topic.

Conclusions:

Although social media being effective to rapidly and globally disseminate scientific content, our experience revealed the user’s passivity of our Facebook page in interacting with links to access information beyond those scientifically digested by the initiative. We expect to overcome users’ passivity with the development of a mobile app with the same purpose of the Facebook page, but offering a more interactive and dynamic interface.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Machado GM, Braga MM

Users are passive in accessing digested scientific evidence using social media: impressions from a cross-sectional study and an insight about how to overcome this barrier

JMIR Preprints. 26/05/2020:20715

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.20715

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/20715

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.