Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Dec 28, 2021)

Date Submitted: May 30, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 3, 2019 - Jul 29, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

A psychometric analysis of the Polish version of the eHealth Literacy Scale (P-eHEALS) among social media users

  • Joanna Burzynska; 
  • Anna Bartosiewicz; 
  • Magdalena Rękas; 
  • Paweł Januszewicz

Background:

Social media have become mainstream online tools that allow individuals to connect and share information. Such platforms also influence people’s health behavior in the way they communicate about personal health, treatments or physicians. But little is known about individuals’ ability to find and apply online health information to specific health problems. The eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) is an instrument developed to measure these skills but it is not available in Polish and there is no evidence on its validity.

Objective:

The objective of our study was to examine the psychometric aspects of the Polish version of eHealth Literacy Scale (P-eHEALS) among Polish social media users.

Methods:

We examined the translated version of the scale in a representative sample of Polish social media users (n = 1527). P-eHEALS was a part of a web-based survey and CAWI (the Computer Assisted Web Interviews) was the method used to gather data. We examined the reliability of the P-eHEALS by calculating Cronbach alpha coefficients and analyzing the principal components. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were used to evaluate construct validity of the instrument.

Results:

The internal consistency of the P-eHEALS was sufficient: Cronbach alpha = .84. Item-total correlations ranged from r = .514 to .666. EFA revealed a single structure explaining 47.42% of the variance, with high factor loadings of the item, ranging from .623 to .769. CFA confirmed one-factor structure of the scale and certify that the P-eHEALS had good overall model fit: RMSEA = .067, χ2/df = 1.981, CFI = .969, TLI = 0.985, SRMR = .038.

Conclusions:

The single P-eHEALS structure was supported in social media users. The study results showed that the items of the Polish version of eHEALS were equivalent to the original instrument developed by Norman and Skinner in 2006 and may be used to identify the level of eHealth literacy among social media users.

Clinicaltrial:


 Citation

Please cite as:

Burzynska J, Bartosiewicz A, Rękas M, Januszewicz P

A psychometric analysis of the Polish version of the eHealth Literacy Scale (P-eHEALS) among social media users

JMIR Preprints. 30/05/2019:14838

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.14838

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/14838

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.