Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Nursing (no longer under consideration since Mar 10, 2020)

Date Submitted: May 7, 2019
Open Peer Review Period: May 10, 2019 - Jul 5, 2019
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Quality Evaluation of a Mobile Application as a Learning Aid for Nurses and Students to identify and Care for Stroke Patients

  • Camila Baccin; 
  • Grace T Marcon Dal Sasso; 
  • Crysttian Arantes Paixao

Background:

Around the world there is a growing expansion in m-health due to the ease of access to mobile phones and broadband internet. The field of nursing care of the patient with stroke has proven to be receptive to this technological evolution, both for the identification of risk factors in the population, as well as in the training and certification of professionals in the nursing care of stroke patients. In this way, nurses participate not only as developers of technologies for care, but also with scientific validation, with results of support to health services and training.

Objective:

To evaluate the efficacy of a mobile application as a learning aid for nurses and nursing students to identify and care for stroke patients in a region of southern Brazil.

Methods:

A study on the development and technological evaluation of the instructional design stages of an application was conducted for the period from July to November 2017 in a region of southern Brazil. This involved two clinical cases according to Problem Based Learning and Persuasive Technology. The quality evaluation was based on the Learning Object Review Instrument (LORI®). The resulting data were processed and analyzed using the R® programming language version 3.4.3. We used descriptive statistics (mean, median, minimum value, maximum value, and standard deviation) to compare both groups and a non-parametric test with a 5% significance level.

Results:

The mean of the variables was high (described as "very good"). The variables including content quality, learning goal alignment, motivation, feedback, and adaptation were notable with averages ranging from 4.91 (± 0.28) to 4.97 (± 0.16). Statistical analyses demonstrated that there was agreement between the nurse and student groups for the variables motivation (0.012), presentation design (0.019), re-usability (0.18) and standards compliance (0.45).

Conclusions:

It was determined that the mSmartAVC application satisfies international quality certification criteria and improves the decision-making and clinical evaluation of nurses and students.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Baccin C, Dal Sasso GTM, Paixao CA

Quality Evaluation of a Mobile Application as a Learning Aid for Nurses and Students to identify and Care for Stroke Patients

JMIR Preprints. 07/05/2019:14644

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.14644

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/14644

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.