Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Large language models in undergraduate medical education - student use, perceptions, and outcomes: a systematic review
ABSTRACT
Background:
Large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, are increasingly being used in medical education. Medical students use them for purposes such as supporting their self-directed learning. Educators are increasingly using them to support teaching, for example in simulating patient conversations. Adoption is generally ahead of institutional endorsement or training.
Objective:
This review seeks to better understand how and why medical students use LLMs and their educational impact.
Methods:
A systematic review was conducted, following PRISMA guidelines, of studies that involved medical students using LLMs and reported students’ use, perceptions or educational outcomes. Original peer-reviewed research available in English was included between November 2022 and July 2025. Two reviewers independently screened papers, extracted data and appraised quality using CASP. Data were synthesised using a narrative synthesis framework.
Results:
54 studies were included, including cross-sectional and interventional studies. Awareness of LLMs was very high amongst medical students, while use was more variable. Most students used ChatGPT. Students report LLMs provided benefits to learning efficiency and more personalised learning, though this did not necessarily translate to better knowledge retention. Interventional studies using LLMs to simulate patient interactions, and provide personalised feedback, improved students’ performance and confidence. Students had concerns around accuracy, data, and overreliance which coexisted with use. Verification of outputs was often low but correlated with prior understanding of AI. Students were supportive of more formal training on AI.
Conclusions:
LLMs can be useful in supporting students’ learning and are being adopted by medical students. They can provide benefits as tools for low-stakes practice of communication skills and in providing feedback. Many students have concerns around accuracy but lack the skills to critically appraise LLM outputs. Institutions should provide formal training on LLM use to develop verification habits, model good LLM-use, and prepare students for AI they will encounter in clinical practice. Clinical Trial: Badakhshan U, Ahadi N, Athavale R. Large language model use among medical students in medical education: a systematic review [protocol]. Open Science Framework; 2025. doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/YMCW8.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.