Currently submitted to: JMIR Medical Education
Date Submitted: Oct 28, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 29, 2026 - Dec 24, 2026
(currently open for review)
Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
From AI Adoption to Human–AI Learning: The Role of Faculty Development in Latin American Medical Education
ABSTRACT
Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI, is rapidly transforming medical education by driving advancements in adaptive learning, clinical simulation, and comprehensive literature synthesis. In Latin America, these technologies serve as a vital incentive for educational innovation, offering a unique opportunity to give access to high-quality training materials in resource-constrained settings. However, the responsible integration of AI extends far beyond mere student adoption or technological efficiency. It demands a paradigm shift for medical educators, who must now actively master these tools to supervise their application, reimagine assessment methods, and safeguard academic integrity, all while ensuring that fundamental clinical reasoning remains at the core of medical training. To inform this Perspective, we conducted a targeted evidence search across PubMed, SciELO, and LILACS on June 30, 2026, evaluating empirical studies on AI utilization, readiness, and curricular integration among Latin American medical educators. Strikingly, the search revealed a profound gap in regional data, yielding only a single relevant study focused on medical specialty professors in Mexico. This scarcity reveals that the educators who must guide AI adoption remain critically underrepresented in the literature. We introduce a framework for AI integration in Latin American medical education. Our approach begins by identifying faculty readiness and sequentially builds competence in AI literacy, pedagogical application, and assessment redesign, all while rigorously upholding academic integrity and equity. Most importantly, this framework positions medical educators as critical mediators of human–AI interaction, preserving human agency, clinical reasoning, and academic integrity while enabling responsible AI-supported learning. The future of AI in our region depends no longer on monitoring student adoption, but rather on empowering educators and institutions to champion its responsible integration.
Citation
Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.
Copyright
© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.