Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: JMIR Human Factors

Date Submitted: Oct 28, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 29, 2026 - Dec 24, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Acceptability and Workload Impact of AI-Based Remote Monitoring Technology for Night Care Staff: A pilot study

  • Marie Dandois; 
  • Elodie Le Toullec; 
  • Patrice Piette; 
  • Bérangère Naudé; 
  • Bastien Fraudet; 
  • Laura Bedubourg; 
  • Véronique H Flamand; 
  • François Routhier; 
  • Mathilde Lefort; 
  • Emilie LEBLONG; 
  • Emilie LEBLONG

ABSTRACT

Background:

The increasing number of older people presents challenges for healthcare systems, particularly in nursing homes, where care at night is ensured by limited staff. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI)-based remote monitoring technologies could support care staff by improving responsiveness and resident safety. However, their acceptability and impact on workload remain underexplored.

Objective:

This pilot study aimed to evaluate (1) the acceptability of an AI-based remote monitoring system among night care staff in nursing homes, and (2) its effect on the perceived workload of healthcare professionals.

Methods:

We conducted a multimethod study in four French nursing homes over an 8-month period. The technology called the “augmented ear”, detects abnormal sounds and sends real-time alerts to staff smartphones. Acceptability was assessed using the extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) at three time points (pre-use, mid-use, post-use), and workload was measured via the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). Semi-structured group interviews were conducted to enrich quantitative findings.

Results:

Twenty-three night care staff participated. UTAUT scores showed correct initial acceptability, which remained stable, particularly regarding performance expectancy and intention to use. However, ethical concerns (e.g., resident privacy, professionals’ surveillance) and technical limitations (e.g., connectivity, alert reliability) emerged. Workload trends suggested a decrease in physical and mental demand over time, but these changes were not statistically significant. Qualitative data revealed both perceived benefits, like improved fall detection and faster response, as well as burdens, like alert fatigue, decision overload and fear of reduced professional autonomy.

Conclusions:

The findings suggest a generally favorable level of acceptability for the “augmented ear” device by the night care staff. Nevertheless, the study highlights the need for better alert calibration, ethical consideration, and device integration to prevent cognitive overload and ensure alignment with care staff values.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Dandois M, Le Toullec E, Piette P, Naudé B, Fraudet B, Bedubourg L, Flamand VH, Routhier F, Lefort M, LEBLONG E, LEBLONG E

Acceptability and Workload Impact of AI-Based Remote Monitoring Technology for Night Care Staff: A pilot study

JMIR Preprints. 28/10/2026:115578

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.115578

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/115578

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.