Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Nursing (no longer under consideration since Oct 16, 2026)

Date Submitted: Oct 16, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Oct 16, 2026 - Oct 16, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Barriers to Self-Management in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Qualitative Study Based on the COM‑B Model

  • Xingda Jin; 
  • Shaonan Liu; 
  • Xiaohui Wei; 
  • Qiqi Liu; 
  • Zhixia Wang; 
  • Yue Zhang; 
  • Yuanyuan Tang; 
  • Junrong Ding; 
  • Rui Li

ABSTRACT

Background:

Lung transplant recipients require lifelong rehabilitation, in which patient self-management is particularly crucial. However, low participation in proactive self-management is widespread and may adversely affect patient outcomes. In China’s healthcare context, research on specific barriers to self-management among lung transplant recipients remains limited.

Objective:

This study aims to employ the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation–Behaviour) model to investigate these barriers, thereby providing a basis for developing targeted interventions to improve patient activation and support sustained self-management practices.

Methods:

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with 18 lung transplant recipients recruited from a tertiary hospital in Shanghai, China, between November and December 2025. Semi-structured interviews were used for data collection, and inductive thematic analysis based on the COM-B model was applied for data analysis

Results:

The self-management barriers in lung transplant recipients were summarized into three themes and eight sub-themes: capability factors (lack of awareness of disease management responsibilities, and insufficient ability to acquire and integrate health information); opportunity factors (limited availability of standardized health education resources, lack of family and social support, and external pressures such as economic burdens leading to increased resource consumption); and motivation factors (prognostic disparities resulting in diminished self-efficacy, prevalence of symptom-driven passive management behaviours, and widespread negative emotions).

Conclusions:

The barriers to self-management in lung transplant recipients are complex. Nursing staff can enhance patients’ self-management capabilities by tailoring interventions to individual needs, strengthening self-management education, mobilizing diverse support systems, and stimulating patients’ subjective initiative. Clinical Trial: Not Applicable


 Citation

Please cite as:

Jin X, Liu S, Wei X, Liu Q, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Tang Y, Ding J, Li R

Barriers to Self-Management in Lung Transplant Recipients: A Qualitative Study Based on the COM‑B Model

JMIR Preprints. 16/10/2026:114561

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.114561

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/114561

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.