Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: JMIR Formative Research (no longer under consideration since Sep 02, 2018)

Date Submitted: May 11, 2018
Open Peer Review Period: May 14, 2018 - Jul 9, 2018
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Patient-centric portable health record exchange: A feasibility study

  • Audrey Ozols; 
  • Eugene Luskin; 
  • Paul Buehrens

Background:

Patient medical records contain important information for healthcare professionals to make the right decisions that provide efficient care and optimize quality patient outcomes. Electronic health record (EHR) systems are now the standard to document patient health information. However, the exchange of patient protected health information remains a challenge due to the lack of connectivity across hundreds of different EHR systems.

Objective:

The aim of the study is to describe the implementation of a secure and EHR-agnostic portable patient medical record technology, and to describe initial user experiences.

Methods:

We developed the VYRTY solution, a HIPPA compliant and secure medical record card and reader that allows for user authentication, patient authentication, data capture, data storage, and documentation sharing that works with any EHR system. Storage of all patient medical records is encrypted on the VYRTY card allowing safe patient transportation of medical records. Physician activation was phased in over the first 5 months of the one-year pilot. Patient enrollment was voluntary and was complete within 8 months from start of the pilot. Physicians uploaded medical record documents from their EHR by using the print function. Patients that were referred shared their VYRTY card with the receiving physician for downloading of medical records. The exchange of medical records was recorded by the VYRTY system and personal interviews were conducted and recorded to assess user experience.

Results:

One hundred and ninety-four patients participated out of 200 enrolled, while 23 physicians actively participated out of 45 enrolled. Patients utilized their VYRTY cards 49% of the time, and physicians downloaded documents 51% of the time during the 1-year pilot period. Participating physicians found VYRTY easy to use and their patients were very satisfied with the convenient portability of their medical records.

Conclusions:

VYRTY was implemented successfully and found to be easy to use by physicians and patients. Using the VYRTY system gave patients their own medical records to share with other providers, which effectively solved the problem of exchanging health information between different EHR systems.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Ozols A, Luskin E, Buehrens P

Patient-centric portable health record exchange: A feasibility study

JMIR Preprints. 11/05/2018:11033

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.11033

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/11033

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.