Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Previously submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research (no longer under consideration since Aug 27, 2026)

Date Submitted: Aug 9, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Aug 10, 2026 - Oct 5, 2026
(closed for review but you can still tweet)

NOTE: This is an unreviewed Preprint

Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint (What is a preprint?). Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn (a note "no longer under consideration" will appear above).

Peer review me: Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period (in this case, a "Peer Review Me" button to sign up as reviewer is displayed above). All preprints currently open for review are listed here. Outside of the formal open peer-review period we encourage you to tweet about the preprint.

Citation: Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author).

Final version: If our system detects a final peer-reviewed "version of record" (VoR) published in any journal, a link to that VoR will appear below. Readers are then encourage to cite the VoR instead of this preprint.

Settings: If you are the author, you can login and change the preprint display settings, but the preprint URL/DOI is supposed to be stable and citable, so it should not be removed once posted.

Submit: To post your own preprint, simply submit to any JMIR journal, and choose the appropriate settings to expose your submitted version as preprint.

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Strengthening the Measurement of Digital Inclusion Through Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from a Population-Based Survey in Bihar, India

  • Mayank Date; 
  • Diwakar Mohan; 
  • Arpita Chakraborty; 
  • Kerry Scott; 
  • Osama Ummer; 
  • Amnesty LeFevre

ABSTRACT

Background:

Robust measurement of digital inclusion is increasingly recognized as essential for monitoring progress toward equitable digital transformation. However, population-based surveys, including those which aim to measure digital inclusion, often include complex skip patterns, derived variables, and sensitive self-reported behaviors, making them particularly vulnerable to interviewer error, inconsistent data collection, and data falsification. Despite growing investment in digital solutions and increasing recognition of the importance of measuring who these interventions reach, there is limited guidance on scalable quality assurance approaches to ensure the validity and reliability of population-based digital inclusion data in low- and middle-income countries.

Objective:

To design and implement a multi-layered quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) approach to improve data integrity in a large-scale household survey in a resource constrained setting.

Methods:

The study surveyed 13,568 respondents across 6087 households in 10 randomly selected districts of Bihar. A three-pronged QA/QC approach was deployed: (i) real-time quality control during data collection, (ii) rule-based error flagging to identify logical and range inconsistencies, and (iii) machine learning–based anomaly detection using the Isolation Forest algorithm to detect non-obvious patterns in error combinations. The system generated 17 binary error flags, including an anomaly flag identifying records in the top 5% of anomaly scores. Weekly feedback loops and interactive dashboards supported timely field-level corrective actions.

Results:

Implementation of the QA/QC approach resulted in an over 85% reduction in weekly errors over the 12-week data collection period. The anomaly detection component identified subtle but meaningful inconsistencies, such as irregular patterns in “don’t know” responses to survey questions, enhancing the sensitivity and depth of quality monitoring.

Conclusions:

Integrating rule-based validation with machine learning–based anomaly detection substantially strengthens QA/QC processes in complex survey environments. This scalable and replicable approach improves data quality in large-scale household surveys, particularly where interviewer error and data falsification are potential concerns. As countries increasingly invest in digital technologies and seek to evaluate the effectiveness, equity, and reach of these programs, robust measurement is essential for generating robust evidence to inform policy and programming. Although developed for a digital inclusion survey, the QA/QC approach is broadly applicable to other complex household surveys requiring rigorous quality assurance. With appropriate adaptation, its core components including real-time monitoring, automated validation, anomaly detection, and continuous feedback can also be embedded within routine technology-enabled health and development programs to strengthen data quality, support continuous quality improvement, and enable more timely, evidence-informed decision-making.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Date M, Mohan D, Chakraborty A, Scott K, Ummer O, LeFevre A

Strengthening the Measurement of Digital Inclusion Through Artificial Intelligence: Evidence from a Population-Based Survey in Bihar, India

JMIR Preprints. 09/08/2026:109155

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.109155

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/109155

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.