Maintenance Notice

Due to necessary scheduled maintenance, the JMIR Publications website will be unavailable from Wednesday, July 01, 2020 at 8:00 PM to 10:00 PM EST. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause you.

Who will be affected?

Currently submitted to: Journal of Medical Internet Research

Date Submitted: Jun 18, 2026
Open Peer Review Period: Jun 19, 2026 - Aug 14, 2026
(currently open for review)

Warning: This is an author submission that is not peer-reviewed or edited. Preprints - unless they show as "accepted" - should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.

Bidirectional Relationship Between eHealth Literacy and Illness Cognitions After Urolithiasis Surgery: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis

  • Zhengbo Pan; 
  • Dongpeng Zhang; 
  • Xingzhang Ling; 
  • Xin Lv; 
  • Binhui Wang

ABSTRACT

Background:

Urolithiasis is a highly prevalent urological condition with recurrence rates exceeding 50% within five years. While eHealth literacy has been associated with better health outcomes, its dynamic interplay with illness cognitions, particularly illness-related helplessness, acceptance, and perceived benefits—remains poorly understood. Guided by Leventhal's Common-Sense Model, this study examined the bidirectional relationships between eHealth literacy and illness cognitions over a six-month period following urolithiasis surgery.

Objective:

To investigate the directionality and magnitude of longitudinal associations between eHealth literacy and three dimensions of illness cognitions (helplessness, acceptance, and perceived benefits) in postoperative urolithiasis patients.

Methods:

A three-wave longitudinal design was employed with 368 patients who underwent urolithiasis surgery. Data were collected at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), and 6 months (T3) postoperatively. eHealth literacy was measured using the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS), and illness cognitions were assessed with the Illness Cognition Questionnaire (ICQ). Cross-lagged panel models (CLPMs) were estimated to examine bidirectional effects while controlling for autoregressive stability.

Results:

The primary CLPM (eHEALS–Helplessness) demonstrated good fit (χ²=9.94, df=6, P=0.127; CFI=0.988; TLI=0.967; RMSEA=0.050). Significant bidirectional cross-lagged effects were identified: higher eHEALS predicted lower Helplessness (T1→T2: β=−0.096, P=0.003; T2→T3: β=−0.245, P<0.001), while Helplessness also predicted lower eHEALS (T1→T2: β=−0.099, P=0.017; T2→T3: β=−0.139, P=0.010), revealing a bidirectional negative spiral. Supplementary models revealed that eHEALS predicted increased Acceptance (β=0.098 at T2→T3, P=0.010) and Perceived Benefits (β=0.083–0.092, P<0.01), with reverse effects being non-significant.

Conclusions:

eHealth literacy and illness helplessness are reciprocally related in a bidirectional negative spiral, while eHealth literacy exerts unidirectional effects on promoting acceptance and perceived benefits. These findings delineate a public health causal chain—eHealth literacy → adaptive illness cognitions → improved self-management → reduced recurrence risk—that supports the integration of eHealth literacy interventions into postoperative care and tiered healthcare systems to facilitate cognitive adaptation and recurrence prevention in urolithiasis.


 Citation

Please cite as:

Pan Z, Zhang D, Ling X, Lv X, Wang B

Bidirectional Relationship Between eHealth Literacy and Illness Cognitions After Urolithiasis Surgery: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis

JMIR Preprints. 18/06/2026:105018

DOI: 10.2196/preprints.105018

URL: https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/105018

Download PDF


Request queued. Please wait while the file is being generated. It may take some time.

© The authors. All rights reserved. This is a privileged document currently under peer-review/community review (or an accepted/rejected manuscript). Authors have provided JMIR Publications with an exclusive license to publish this preprint on it's website for review and ahead-of-print citation purposes only. While the final peer-reviewed paper may be licensed under a cc-by license on publication, at this stage authors and publisher expressively prohibit redistribution of this draft paper other than for review purposes.